中文版
Home   |   Current Issue   |   Past Issues   |   About Us   |   Contact Us
Number 3, 2014 back

Why Say “No” to Congestion Pricing: Post-mortem on the Edinburgh Referendum Results
Deng Taotao, Feng Suwei


Abstract:

The implementation of congestion pricing has faced with considerable uncertainty. A critical analysis of the failure case has undoubtedly added an important reference value to our country`s pilot of congestion pricing. In 2005 a referendum on congestion charging draft was conducted in Edinburgh. The failure of referendum caused the local authority to give up the congestion pricing program which had been discussed for nearly 12 years. This paper analyzes the background of Edinburgh congestion pricing scheme and the detailed implementation measures, with a focus on reasons why public boycott for congestion pricing. Results show that there is a big controversy in the congestion pricing zoning, the definition of exemption, charging timing and promotion strategies, resulting in the failure of referendum. The paper points out that the major cities in China need to carefully consider the right time and promotion strategies of implementing congestion pricing, actively seek the strong support from the potential beneficiaries and make good efforts to coordinate with adjacent administrative regions in implementing congestion pricing scheme, in order to reduce the risk of policy.

Keywords:

Road Congestion Pricing; Edinburgh; Referendum; Boycott

back
 

广告业务 |  协办业务 |  在线投稿 |  杂志订阅 |  联系我们 |  版权所有

建议使用IE6.0以上版本 1024*768以上分辨率浏览
《国际城市规划》杂志编辑部版权所有 技术支持:SEO专家万维联通